|
|
Syllabus supplementDialogue:Think of the dialogue as one additional way of discussing things with the others in the class. Since many do not have the chance to meet with one another after class, this electronic tool gives everyone the chance to do that. What would you say to one another about the topics? As far as my place in the dialogues is concerned: the instructor is supposed to have an occasional presence but make sure not to dominate in this kind of tool. Hmmm. In other words, this is your forum to dialogue with one another and I should only pop in to correct a serious mistake or remind folks to be civil. I have to admit, there will probably be occasions when I won’t be able to help myself! But for the most part I will just be recording everyone’s level of participation for your course grade. The dialogue participation will count towards 10% of the course grade.
Comments on Question 4: As we move further into the concept of narratives and narratology the course content guide includes scientifc paradigms as a topic for inclusion. Thomas Kuhn is of special interest here. It seems pretty clear to me when we associate the concept of “narrative” with the language games of math and then scientific hypothesis, it is the concept of “paradigm” that is most pertinent. But what is the relationship? There are concepts of narrative paradigms and that is a very good way of thinking about narratives. Would that do the trick?
|
This page is maintained by William S. Jamison. It was last updated July 11, 2016. All links on these pages are either to open source or public domain materials or they are marked with the appropriate copyright information. I frequently check the links I have made to other web sites but each source is responsible for their own content. |